Recent Posts

Order Entries by:
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Sep 04, 2008

    (I found this as part of another larger story about Facebook)

    While costly, risky, and foreign to brands, the biggest missed opportunity for brands in social networks is to become part of the community, interact and build real relationships. Although we should expect interaction rates and viral spread to increase with engagement ads, brands should wait and see how these ads CTR perform. For those brands that are ready to forgo the risk, and pursue ‘Engagement Ads’ they should:

    • Be community themed: Ads created by the brand will succeed if the content is first focused on the needs of the community.
    • Rely on new interaction activities: The rules of the game have changed, the goal is to increase interaction within the community –not pull them offsite.
    • Approach with an Integrated Mix: Facebook offers many tools, ‘Engagement Ads’ shouldn’t go it alone, instead increase chances of success by involving other tools.
    • Change how they measure success: Brands must also change they way the measure success with these interactive ads, rather than weigh success solely on page views or referral traffic.

    What Facebook's New Engagement Advertising Means to Brands
    Published 04 September 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Sep 03, 2008
    In a riff on "If you build it, they will come", many online services are seeing their paid subscriptions increase when they add storage AND make it easy to use.  The real key is making it easy to use. 

    Google sells extra space to use with Picasa, and Google Docs.  Online networks like Ning and Multiply offer lots for free, then you can remove ads and store lots more content if you pay a small subscription fee.

    Multiply.com recently released a mass upload utility which has resulted in lots of additional uploads and many more subscribers thumbnail ID images have suddenly started showing the 'P' icon which designates premium subscribers.

    Many social networks expected to monetize in other ways, but any revenue will do.  So what if that big social network is just a front for a nice online storage business.

    The next wave in storage is online, and the shift is happening now.


    Published 03 September 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Sep 03, 2008
    NPR's show, On the Media, had the founder and CEO of CafePress on this weekend.  CafePress, is the place where you can upload your own designs for T-shirts, hats, posters, etc.  According to the CEO, GW Bush shirts were more popular than John Kerry in the past election cycle and we all know what happened there. 

    The CEO felt that T-shirt sales was an indicator of the enthusiasm of supporters.  If that's an indicator, John McCain is in deep trouble.  Obama shirts are outselling McCain by a huge margin.  Some might attribute this to the younger supporters for Obama, but the Bush anecdote puts that somewhat in question.

    And in this election we can also judge by the number of 'friends' each candidate has in the SocialSphere.  (copyright, and trademark hereby relinquished)

    According to TechCrunch, McCain is way behind Obama on both MySpace and Facebook. 

    In an attempt to shore up it's position in the online world the McCain campaign just relaunched it's online presence with a full private community.  Better late than never?  I'm not sure.

    One thing is for sure.  The first clue that Sarah Palin would be the VP came when someone made extensive edits to her Wikipedia page a day before the announcement.

    See More here - TechCrunch - McCainSpace Relaunches

        McCain   Obama
     % Diff
     Facebook  226,000 1,400,000
      625%
     MySpace  66,665 467,800
      700%
    Published 03 September 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 5 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Sep 03, 2008
    It was hinted at when World of Warcraft spawned a raft of so-called 'gold farmers' who played the game solely so they could earn gold to sell to other players.  Then a whole WoW gold economy sprouted.  Blizzard, the makers of WoW, took steps to kill this and the trading of other in-game goods like weapons, but the implications were very clear.  Real people will spend real money on virtual goods.  Some players were selling whole accounts for over $500 on eBay, until Blizzard squashed the practice.  They were content with making $14.95/month per player.  This was a very stupid move, IMO, but I digress.

    Next came virtual worlds like Maple Story where the game and the play were free, but the goods cost money.  Want to move ahead faster?  Buy some credits.  Want to finish this quest faster?  Buy the xyz spell for 10 credits.  As far as I know they are rolling in read dough.

    Second Life is another virtual world with a real economy.  SL will sell you a nice spot in their new development, or even on a new planet or space station.  SL also lets players resell goods and real estate.  Now we're talking!  This has spawned a serious economy, but it's less compelling than in the gaming communities which have 10 times the revenue potential.

    Well, Facebook got into the real virtual economy game with digital gifts a little while back.  Now it seems they are selling at a $35 million dollar run rate.  I kid you not.

    The bottom line, literally, is that online viritual economies are a growing business.  And they are not limited only to virtual worlds, or even social networks, they apply to all online communities.

    "Time is money" as Ben Franklin said.  If you can spend a few bucks instead of a few hours, there will always be some people who value their time highly enough to reach for their wallets.

    See these posts for more.

    Lightspeed Venture Partners Blog - Facebook Virtual Economy

    CNET Weighs In



    Is the virtual economy is the future of our real economy?  Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.



    Published 03 September 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 5 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Sep 03, 2008
    A day after Google launched its Chrome browser, the blogoshpere is abuzz with inImplications of this major release.

    Chrome Provides Entry Point for "The Google Social Network"

    Google is certainly interested in Social Networking.  They released the Open Social API as a way to level the playing field and allow you and your profile to be free to join multiple networks, etc.  Facebook and MySpace represent closed networks.  Chrome could be a backdoor that allows Google to create a defactor social network.  Facebook has already shown us how this could work.  Starting around June, when you are logged into Facebook, you can see friends who are also logged on and you can easily chat with them, all from within the browser.  Google could easily allow you to do the same across your whole online experience.  Then they can leverage this into a defacto network by using the implicit social graph represented by who your have sent and received Gmail messages to or from. 

    Google could either leverage this as a private entry point, which would diminish interest and growth.  OR they could combine it with Open Social to provide a completely open network where all social networks have to play on the same level playing field.  I expect them to do the latter.  Google has shown a definite orientation towards openness.  Besides, it only further expands their advertising reach.

    Chrome will be used on the Android Open Mobile Phone Platform

    This provides even more of a threat to Microsoft.  The so-called Smartphone has been a faithful extension of the Windows experience, and there is the problem.  Smartphones are not so smart, or easy, or fun, or useful.  Apple has shown what's possible by leaping far ahead.  So far Android is yet to be seen, but the early leaked info looks so-so. Let's hope the reality exceeds the early info.

    With Chrome as the browser, Google could be right there with Apple.  Apple would represent the private platform.  Google would represent the open platform. 

    Chrome Could Enhance Google's Ad Targeting

    By owning the whole browser experience, Google could offer unprecedented targeted search results.  If anyone can, it's Google.  We could all be dead before Microsoft's Live search comes alive.

    What do you think?

    Share your thoughts with us in the comments.  Do you think Chrome is the beginning of the end for Microsoft?  Will Google force the future of Social Networking to be open?  Will Google take over the whole web?  Let us know what you think.
    Published 03 September 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 5 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Sep 02, 2008

    Today Google released its new web browser.  It was announce on the Official Google Blog yesterday.  It's called Chrome and it's based on the Firefox open-source.  This is major news, not just hype.



    As browser-based apps become more important, it's important that Google has the ability to control the browser environment more completely.  I would have expected them to collaborate with Firefox, but they seem to be taking a side step.  I'm not sure if this semi-independence is important to them, or just a necessity of working with an Open-Source organization.  Google will be contributing its code back to the Firefox community, so it's possible that Google will mainly be reworking certain key elements of the architecture. 

    Part of the purpose is to isolate each tab.  This is important for enhanced fault tolerance.  Today, if one tab crashes, it takes the whole browser down with it.  Also it's not multi-threaded, and the garbage collection (release of resources used) when a tab is closed is not thorough.  If you leave the browser open for days, it eventually uses more and more memory.  Internet Explorer is the worst.  Firefox is much better.  Chrome is supposed to be even better.

    Google has been working on this project since 2006, so it's no minor flash in the pan.

    Some are calling this the beginning of the Google OS. Also known as 'the Windows killer'.  I agree.  As the trend for apps to move to the web continues, the Browser is the key.  This kind of speculation was all over the press about 5 years ago.  Then it totally died down.  Well, it's official now.  Apple has Safari, and Google now has Chrome. 

    I can only hope that Google will fully support the openness of its code and that this will become Firefox or, more likely, it will become the successor to Firefox.  Otherwise we are looking at a balkanization of the browser world and that will mean development of web sites will become much more difficult since web innovators will have to test on each of the main browsers to enable broad adoption. 

    TechCrunch's Take

    ZD Net - Chrome is friendly to Firefox

    CNET Article - Google Steps on Firefox
     
    Google Blog Article - A Fresh Take on the Browser

    PC World Article - with Screen Shots

    ** Official Google Chrome Web Page **
     

    Sample Screenshot from the Google Chrome web page before it got slammed.

    The Google Chrome "Comic Book" describes Chrome.

     
    Published 02 September 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Aug 30, 2008
    This just in - Yahoo has decided to pull the plug on Yahoo Mash. 

    From CNET yesterday - - -

    Yahoo Mash: When getting social isn't enough

    Let's hope Yahoo has finally learned that the maxim "If you build it, they will come" simply does not apply to a social network.

    The Silicon Valley mainstay and onetime Microsoft shopping-spree target is quietly shutting down Yahoo Mash, its latest foray into creating a general-interest social network like a Facebook or MySpace.

    It's the latest social-networking failure for Yahoo, which was unable to get its earlier "Yahoo 360" network off the ground, and once attempted to purchase Facebook, only to have its billion-dollar offer turned down.

    Mash was cute, with a slick interface, and Yahoo already had the advantage of millions of registered users to roll right into it. But its failure to catch on is indicative of a bigger truth in the social-networking world: a new player in this saturated market has to offer something legitimately new and useful.

    Yes, really. And let it be a lesson to any other would-be Facebook killers.

    Critics of social networks say they're nothing but gimmicky fads, pointing to the popularity of silly Facebook applications and the flashy glitter text that adorns many teenagers' MySpace profiles. That just isn't true: if you look at the two biggest social-networking success stories, Facebook and MySpace, each one has served a distinct utility since its debut.


    Read the full article here ...


    Published 30 August 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Aug 26, 2008
    The NY Times reported that Amazon is acquiring Shelfari, the social network for book lovers. This is a little surprising in that Amazon has a pretty good user-community already.  I'm not sure what Shelfari brings to Amazon, though I'm sure it won't hurt.  According to Compete.com Shelfari has over 170,000 unique visitors a month. 

    In Feb 2007 Amazon invested $1 million in Shelfari's Series A round.

    NY Times Article

    Shelfari's Web Site

    Compete.com Stats for Shelfari versus LibraryThing


    Published 26 August 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Aug 22, 2008

    (from eMarketer.com)


    Social Networks Get Down to Business

    AUGUST 18, 2008

    Think of them as digital water coolers—surrounded by thousands of workers engaged in serious business conversations.

    Do business and socializing mix?

    Apparently so. As the number of business users of social networks continues to increase, advertising expenditures will rise, too. In the US this year, advertisers will spend $40 million to reach a business audience on online social networks, and that is just the beginning. According to eMarketer projections, that ad spending will reach $210 million in 2012.

    (Read the Full Article at eMarketer.com)

    Published 22 August 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Jun 21, 2008
    There has been much written about the semantic web in the last 5 years, but very little has made it out of the laboratory.

    I believe the Semantic Web is a victim of over-thinking and over-engineering. 

    Care to share your opinion?
    Published 21 June 2008 - 3 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Jun 20, 2008
    The Washington Post

    It's a story that's been written before, but it's certainly one that bears repeating-especially when you consider the steady rise of digital amid traditional media's declining ad market: major brands are still not shifting their ad dollars to the Web. Indeed, the top spender on the Internet in the U.S. last year was the University of Phoenix-not exactly a major global brand. The fact that an American university ranks at the top of Internet sponsors highlights a stark reality, says the Washington Post: major U.S. advertisers have (still) not fully embraced the Web.

    Case in point: P&G, one of the largest U.S. advertisers, spent less than 2% of its ad budget on the Web last year. "While spending on Internet marketing has been growing dramatically over the past decade, the top 50 or 60 brand marketers are very much underrepresented," said Randall Rothenberg, president and CEO of the Interactive Advertising Bureau, adding that the industry has grown mostly "by grabbing the low-hanging fruit"-i.e. search and other forms of direct response advertising.

    Meanwhile, the largest source of revenue for online content providers is display. These publishers would love to tap into the billions that the likes of P&G have at their disposal, but these marketers have several issues with the Web. For one thing, they're more accustomed to creating and presenting 15-second TV spots or magazine ads. For another, some media buyers think it's more difficult to get precise information about how an ad is performing on the Web than in traditional media. - Read the whole story...
    Published 20 June 2008 - 1 comment (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Jun 19, 2008
    Want to know what's hot and what's not in web programming?

    Check out this great article from Tim Bunce.  There are problems with the data, but it's way better than nothing.  More great graphs with the article.

    Programming Language Job Trends 



    Published 19 June 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Jun 19, 2008
    I ran into this very cool site called TIOBE software.  (TIOBE stands for The Importance of Being Earnest.)

    They have info that I've wanted to know for a long time - Technology (language) trends.  It's not perfect, but you have to start somewhere, and it's pretty well done. 

    The index is supposedly developed from the number of engineers with certain skills.

    Interestingly the top languages are Java, C, and C++.  Even more interestingly, ActionScript just entered the top 20.

    More info at the TIOBE.com site.


    Published 19 June 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Jun 19, 2008
    The percentage of U.S. adults who said they now rely on instant messaging, rose to 22% this year from just 9% in 2007. Among 18- to 34-year-olds, IM dependant crowd grew to 21% from 14% a year ago.

    The percentage of U.S. adults who say they've never sent a text message fell to 41% this year from 49% a year ago. And among 18- to 34-year-olds, it dropped to 22% from 38%.

    One out of 10 U.S. adults now publish blogs, up from just 5% a year ago. Among 18- to 34-year-olds, the rate is twice that, with one out of five publishing blogs, up from 10% a year ago.

    (full article)



     (Image source)
    Published 19 June 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Jun 19, 2008
    Text messaging, blogging and social networking have reached critical mass, with more than half of adults now relying on at least one of these so-called Web 2.0 platforms for communicating with friends, family, or colleagues on a regular basis, finds the latest installment of an ongoing tracking study from Interpublic's Universal McCann unit. The research, which comes from UM's ambitious "Media in Mind" study, one of the first to show that things like blogging were becoming a meaningful personal communications platform several years ago, now finds that among digital media's bleeding edge - adults 18-34 - social media now is the dominant form of personal communication media, with 85% of this influential demographic group relying on one or more Web 2.0 platforms to stay in touch with others... (full article)
    Published 19 June 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Daniel Endy, May 05, 2008
    Yes, to the inevitability of death and taxes, we have permanently added advertising. ----

    5-5-08 - The Wall Street Journal reported this morning on marketing on the Next Gen Web.  In place of the increasingly ignored banner ads and other 'traditional' web advertising, major brands are using social sharing techniques and viral apps to spread their messages.  Don't throw a pie at your Facebook friend, or buy them a virutal beer.  Send them a vitamin water.  (Seriously.)

    Social and Video sites Duck Old Style Pitches, and go for Interactivity  - WSJ

    Finally, after more than 10 years of seeing the future, it's almost here.  In this utopian vision, you are able to find information on anything, efficiently read only what interests you, connect with friends, colleagues, and classmates, watch videos, AND get only the most relevant advertising in the most engaging, traceable, and shareable form.

     Everyone has something to sell, it's an increasingly capitalist society after all, and in order to sell you have to advertise.  The Zen conundrum asks, "If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound?"  And in case you missed it, the answer is no.  You need an observer.  And in the world of capitalism, your product does not make a sound unless it has a consumer.

    And, lest you think some places are immune to the inevitability, soon Google will be inserting relevant ads in your YouTube viewing stream. 

    Ah, progress.


    Published 05 May 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Daniel Endy, May 05, 2008
    The need for multiple personas is finally coming to the forefront.  And Orbius is ready to help.

    From the Washington Post - Friday 5-2-2008

    The Rise of Alter Egos in Everybody's Space

    After Oversharing Users Recast their Online Personas

    --------- Some choice excerpts from the article:

    Not only that, an indiscreet comment in a face-to-face exchange can be regretted and forgotten. Online, it can live for years, providing personal details to potential bosses and marketers.


    "For the first time in history, we can't tailor our image for our specific goals," said Mark R. Leary, professor of psychology and neuroscience at Duke University. "When we have to create an all-purpose social history, how do people juggle competing audiences?"


    Modifying online personalities in search of more privacy "is a natural evolution in our relationship with these technologies," said Mary Madden, senior research specialist with the Pew Internet & American Life Project, who has studied privacy issues among teens on social networks. "There's a bigger pool of people to think about now. Networks we initially considered to be curated and private can start to feel very public."


    Pew research has shown that 66 percent of teens with an online profile have restricted access to it.
    Among teens who allow their profiles to be seen by others, nearly half provide some fake information.


    -------------

    But Facebook does not allow members to go by nicknames, initials or other pseudonyms on the site and will deactivate accounts found to be using a fake name. Chris Kelly, Facebook's chief privacy officer, said using real names encourages people to be accountable for their online behavior.


    "Facebook is not a place to experiment with your identity and have six different profiles that you use based on what day of the week it is and what persona you want to inhabit," he said. "It's meant to be a place to share real-life social context."


    -------------

    Facebook user Katherine Kennedy, 23, who runs her own public relations firm in the District, has more than 2,300 friends, including professional acquaintances, clients and long-time pals. It's tough to keep in touch with them all, she said, so she started a separate profile for close friends so she can be freer in what she shares online.


    "I think it's definitely the case that people are trying to create different circles. We obviously portray different selves when we're with different groups of people," said Eszter Hargittai, assistant professor of communication studies and sociology at Northwestern University, who said she has also considered starting a different profile to communicate just with friends. "A one-size-fits-all approach doesn't work."


    ------------- end of post ------------


    Published 05 May 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Mar 24, 2008
    The purpose of this community is to help people define and map the new territory of Web Communities. These are the next generation of social networks with several key characteristics:
    • Multiple Personas for use with different communities
    • Extensive easy-to-use features for building web communities
    • Communities support internal special interest groups
    Join the conversation.  Help us map out the territory.  Share your insights and your opinions.

    Published 24 March 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 5 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Mar 24, 2008
    Most people don't recall the exact start of the web.  I mark it with the release of the first web browser and web server, Mosaic.  The web has gone through quite a few generational changes since it's then. 

    Web 1.0

    In the first generation of the web sites were 'read' or presentation only.  They basically only told you things.  A very one-way form of communication.

    In the second generation (which came along very quickly) web sites added some interactivity like catalogs, online shopping, store locators, and discussion boards. 

    Then came networking features that allowed people to connect groups and interact with each other.  The earliest versions of these were sites like Yahoo!Groups, Tribe, and Friendster.  Tribe is virtually dead.  Tribe, Friendster and Yahoo Groups still have decent traffic but they have definitely leveled off.  Now each is being hotly pursued by NextGen community sites like Ning, Multiply and WetPaint.

    You can see how the traffic to these sites has been leveling off in the chart below.  The older sites have all reached saturation points because of inherent flaws in their models.  The newer sites are coming on strong but they too will top out when their flaws become evident to their early adopters.





    Web 2.0

    The next major generation earned the moniker Web 2.0 and web sites added much more functionality and interactivity with AJAX.  Things like asynchronous direct updates of certain page elements, and highly functional Javascript User Interfaces.  So far Web 2.0 has mostly resulted in narrowly functional sites.  Many sites have been perfecting themselves as web services provided with embeddable widgets.

    Web 2.0 is also marked by collaboration features that allowed many individuals to contribute and the 'wisdom of the crowd' began to emerge.  A few key sites like Wikipedia have emerged as major examples of what's possible when people are able to collaborate in an unrestricted environment. 


    Social Networking

    We're also now several years into the Social Network revolution.  While the group sites mentioned above did a nice enough job, they did not fully foster networking or connecting with friends and finding new like-minded friends.  Sites that did foster networking grew rapidly.  The most famous was MySpace, but it's being pursued aggressively by Facebook




    Stay tuned for my next installment - The Next Gen Web.  See you then.


    Published 24 March 2008 - 0 comments (View/Post Comments)    Bookmark and Share

Welcome!

Sponsored Ads

v3.5.3802.0 Created By Matt Rosen