Posted in advertising

Order Entries by:
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Sep 04, 2008

    (I found this as part of another larger story about Facebook)

    While costly, risky, and foreign to brands, the biggest missed opportunity for brands in social networks is to become part of the community, interact and build real relationships. Although we should expect interaction rates and viral spread to increase with engagement ads, brands should wait and see how these ads CTR perform. For those brands that are ready to forgo the risk, and pursue ‘Engagement Ads’ they should:

    • Be community themed: Ads created by the brand will succeed if the content is first focused on the needs of the community.
    • Rely on new interaction activities: The rules of the game have changed, the goal is to increase interaction within the community –not pull them offsite.
    • Approach with an Integrated Mix: Facebook offers many tools, ‘Engagement Ads’ shouldn’t go it alone, instead increase chances of success by involving other tools.
    • Change how they measure success: Brands must also change they way the measure success with these interactive ads, rather than weigh success solely on page views or referral traffic.

    What Facebook's New Engagement Advertising Means to Brands
    Published 04 September 2008 - 0 comments
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Aug 22, 2008

    (from eMarketer.com)


    Social Networks Get Down to Business

    AUGUST 18, 2008

    Think of them as digital water coolers—surrounded by thousands of workers engaged in serious business conversations.

    Do business and socializing mix?

    Apparently so. As the number of business users of social networks continues to increase, advertising expenditures will rise, too. In the US this year, advertisers will spend $40 million to reach a business audience on online social networks, and that is just the beginning. According to eMarketer projections, that ad spending will reach $210 million in 2012.

    (Read the Full Article at eMarketer.com)

    Published 22 August 2008 - 0 comments
  • (1 rating)
    • Current Rating: 4 Total Votes: 1
    Posted by Daniel Endy, Jun 20, 2008
    The Washington Post

    It's a story that's been written before, but it's certainly one that bears repeating-especially when you consider the steady rise of digital amid traditional media's declining ad market: major brands are still not shifting their ad dollars to the Web. Indeed, the top spender on the Internet in the U.S. last year was the University of Phoenix-not exactly a major global brand. The fact that an American university ranks at the top of Internet sponsors highlights a stark reality, says the Washington Post: major U.S. advertisers have (still) not fully embraced the Web.

    Case in point: P&G, one of the largest U.S. advertisers, spent less than 2% of its ad budget on the Web last year. "While spending on Internet marketing has been growing dramatically over the past decade, the top 50 or 60 brand marketers are very much underrepresented," said Randall Rothenberg, president and CEO of the Interactive Advertising Bureau, adding that the industry has grown mostly "by grabbing the low-hanging fruit"-i.e. search and other forms of direct response advertising.

    Meanwhile, the largest source of revenue for online content providers is display. These publishers would love to tap into the billions that the likes of P&G have at their disposal, but these marketers have several issues with the Web. For one thing, they're more accustomed to creating and presenting 15-second TV spots or magazine ads. For another, some media buyers think it's more difficult to get precise information about how an ad is performing on the Web than in traditional media. - Read the whole story...
    Published 20 June 2008 - 1 comment

Welcome!


Sponsored Links